The question of whether Andrew Jackson should remain on the $20 bill is a complex one, intertwining historical significance, moral considerations, and modern societal values. Jackson, the seventh President of the United States, is a figure of immense historical importance, but his legacy is deeply controversial. This essay explores multiple perspectives on the issue, weighing the arguments for and against his continued presence on the currency.
The Case for Andrew Jackson on the $20 Bill
Historical Significance
Andrew Jackson was a transformative figure in American history. His presidency (1829-1837) marked the rise of the “common man” in politics, as he championed populism and expanded suffrage to white men without property. Jackson’s victory in the Battle of New Orleans during the War of 1812 solidified his status as a national hero. His leadership during the Nullification Crisis also demonstrated his commitment to preserving the Union, a stance that resonates with the ideals of unity and strength.
Symbol of American Resilience
Jackson’s life story—rising from humble beginnings to the highest office in the land—embodies the American Dream. His perseverance and determination are qualities that many Americans admire. By keeping him on the $20 bill, the U.S. acknowledges the resilience and ambition that have shaped the nation’s identity.
Preservation of History
Removing Jackson from the $20 bill could be seen as an attempt to erase or sanitize history. While his actions, such as the Indian Removal Act, are indefensible by modern standards, they are part of the nation’s complex past. Retaining his image on the currency serves as a reminder of both the progress made and the mistakes that must not be repeated.
The Case Against Andrew Jackson on the $20 Bill
The Indian Removal Act and Trail of Tears
One of the most damning aspects of Jackson’s legacy is his role in the forced relocation of Native Americans. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 led to the Trail of Tears, a brutal and deadly journey that displaced thousands of Indigenous people. This policy resulted in immense suffering and loss of life, making Jackson a symbol of oppression for many Native Americans and their allies.
Opposition to the National Bank and Economic Policies
Jackson’s dismantling of the Second Bank of the United States is another contentious issue. While some view this as a victory for democracy against elitist institutions, others argue that it contributed to economic instability. His policies often favored agrarian interests over industrialization, which some historians believe hindered the nation’s economic progress.
Moral Inconsistencies with Modern Values
In an era where inclusivity and social justice are increasingly prioritized, Jackson’s legacy stands in stark contrast. His ownership of enslaved people and his treatment of Native Americans are incompatible with the values of equality and human rights that many Americans hold dear today. Keeping him on the $20 bill could be seen as an endorsement of these outdated and harmful ideologies.
Alternatives to Jackson on the $20 Bill
Harriet Tubman: A Symbol of Freedom and Courage
One of the most popular proposals is to replace Jackson with Harriet Tubman, a former enslaved person who became a leading abolitionist and conductor of the Underground Railroad. Tubman’s life represents courage, freedom, and the fight for justice—qualities that align with contemporary values. Her inclusion on the $20 bill would honor the contributions of African Americans and women to the nation’s history.
Eleanor Roosevelt: Champion of Human Rights
Another potential candidate is Eleanor Roosevelt, a tireless advocate for civil rights, women’s rights, and social justice. As First Lady and later a delegate to the United Nations, she played a pivotal role in shaping modern human rights discourse. Her presence on the currency would reflect the nation’s commitment to equality and progress.
A Collaborative Approach
Rather than replacing Jackson with a single figure, the U.S. could consider a design that features multiple historical figures, representing the diversity and complexity of American history. This approach would acknowledge the contributions of various communities and foster a more inclusive narrative.
Conclusion
The debate over whether Andrew Jackson should remain on the $20 bill is not just about one man’s legacy; it is a reflection of how the nation chooses to remember its past and envision its future. While Jackson’s historical significance cannot be denied, his actions and policies are at odds with the values of equality and justice that many Americans hold dear today. Replacing him with a figure like Harriet Tubman or adopting a more inclusive design could serve as a powerful statement of the nation’s commitment to progress and inclusivity.
Related Questions
-
What were the key achievements of Andrew Jackson’s presidency? Jackson’s presidency was marked by the expansion of suffrage, the dismantling of the Second Bank of the United States, and his handling of the Nullification Crisis. However, his legacy is also marred by the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears.
-
Why is Harriet Tubman a popular choice to replace Jackson on the $20 bill? Harriet Tubman is celebrated for her role in the abolitionist movement and her work on the Underground Railroad. Her inclusion would honor the contributions of African Americans and women to U.S. history.
-
How does Andrew Jackson’s legacy conflict with modern values? Jackson’s ownership of enslaved people and his policies toward Native Americans, particularly the Trail of Tears, are at odds with contemporary values of equality, human rights, and social justice.
-
What are the arguments for preserving historical figures on currency despite their controversial legacies? Proponents argue that retaining figures like Jackson serves as a reminder of the nation’s complex history, encouraging reflection on past mistakes and progress made over time.
-
Could the U.S. adopt a more inclusive approach to currency design? Yes, the U.S. could feature multiple historical figures or symbols that represent the diversity and shared history of the nation, fostering a more inclusive narrative.
